Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability in Economics and Social Sciences (CRRESS)

A series of virtual and in-person panels on reproducibility, replicability, and transparency in the social sciences.

Funding: NSF-2217493
Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability in Economics and Social Sciences (CRRESS)

Project Information

Authors: Aleksandr Michuda (Swarthmore College) and Lars Vilhuber (Cornell University)

Summary

The Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability in Economics and the Social Sciences (CRRESS) was a series of virtual and in-person panels on the topics of reproducibility, replicability, and transparency in the social sciences. The purpose of scientific publishing is the dissemination of robust research findings, exposing them to the scrutiny of peers and other interested parties. Scientific articles should accurately and completely provide information on the origin and provenance of data and on the analytical and computational methods used. Yet in recent years, doubts about the adequacy of the information provided in scientific articles and their addenda have been voiced.

The conferences addressed various topics in this area: the initiation of research, the conduct of research, the preparation of research for publication, and the scrutiny after publication. Undergraduates, graduate students, and career researchers were able to learn about best practices for transparent, reproducible, and scientifically sound research in the social sciences. The materials produced during the conference series are permanently archived and freely available to all interested parties.

Outcomes

The conference series consisted of 10 webinar sessions held during the 2022-2023 academic year, with a total of 149 registered participants. Sessions covered topics including:

  • Institutional support for reproducibility verification
  • Reproducibility and ethics
  • Teaching reproducibility in undergraduate and graduate education
  • Reproducibility with confidential and proprietary data
  • Disciplinary differences in reproducibility requirements
  • Funder and institutional requirements for reproducible archives

All sessions were recorded and are available on YouTube and archived in Cornell University’s eCommons repository.

The conference resulted in multiple publications in the Harvard Data Science Review’s Special Section on Reproducibility and Replicability and the ongoing Reinforcing Reproducibility and Replicability column, edited by Lars Vilhuber.

Further Information

For complete details, including session information, recordings, publications, and references, see the full outcomes report.

Website: https://labordynamicsinstitute.github.io/crress/

Online Book: https://labordynamicsinstitute.github.io/crress-book/

Publications

All 25 publications funded by grant SES-2217493:
  1. Code Review, Reproducibility, and Improving the Scholarly Record
    Nicholas Ottone and Limor Peer
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jul 2025
  2. We Should Do More Direct Replications in Science
    Stuart Buck
    Harvard Data Science Review, Aug 2024
  3. Introducing Reproducible Research Standards at the World Bank
    Maria Jones
    Harvard Data Science Review, Oct 2024
  4. Why and How We Share Reproducible Research at Yale University’s Institution for Social and Policy Studies
    Limor Peer
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jan 2024
  5. The Role of Third-Party Verification in Research Reproducibility
    Christophe Pérignon
    Harvard Data Science Review, Apr 2024
  6. “Yes We Can!”: A Practical Approach to Teaching Reproducibility to Undergraduates
    Richard Ball
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jul 2023
  7. Publishing Replication Packages: Insights From the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
    Courtney R. Butler
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jul 2023
  8. Disciplinary Support: Why Is Reproducibility Not Uniformly Required across Disciplines?
    2023
  9. Reproducibility With Confidential Data: The Experience of BPLIM
    Paulo Guimarães
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jul 2023
  10. Should Funders Require Reproducible Archives?
    2023
  11. Reproducibility and Confidential or Proprietary Data: Can It Be Done?
    2023
  12. Reproducibility in Economics: Status and Update
    Hilary Hoynes
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jul 2023
  13. Open Data and Code at the Urban Institute
    Graham MacDonald
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jul 2023
  14. Why Can or Should Research Institutions Publish Replication Packages?
    2023
  15. Reproducibility, Confidentiality, and Open Data Mandates
    2023
  16. Data Citations and Reproducibility in the Undergraduate Curriculum
    Diego Mendez-Carbajo and Alejandro Dellachiesa
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jul 2023
  17. Institutional Support: How Do Journal Reproducibility Verification Services Work?
    2023
  18. The Integration of Reproducibility into Social Science Graduate Education.
    2023
  19. The Case for Data Archives at Journals
    Timothy C. Salmon
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jul 2023
  20. Reinforcing Reproducibility and Replicability: An Introduction
    Lars Vilhuber, Ian Schmutte, Aleksandr Michuda, and 1 more author
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jul 2023
  21. Crisis? What Crisis? Sociology’s Slow Progress Toward Scientific Transparency
    Kim A. Weeden
    Harvard Data Science Review, Oct 2023
  22. Costs and Benefits of Reproducibility in Finance and Economics
    Toni Whited
    Harvard Data Science Review, Jul 2023
  23. Institutional Support: Should Journals Verify Reproducibility?
    2022
  24. Should Teaching Reproducibility Be a Part of Undergraduate Education or Curriculum?
    2022
  25. Reproducibility and Ethics - IRBs and Beyond
    2022